Discussion:
CBC Desperate to Ridicule Trump's Media Conspiracy Allegation
(too old to reply)
Kixi
2016-10-19 18:04:26 UTC
Permalink
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.

Since conspiracies are difficult to prove the allegation is indeed a
theory. But people do conspire to achieve important objectives and CBC
bosses have done just that.e.

For example, AFAIK, ALL the mass media sold the lie about Saddam's WMDs
even though the public were sceptical ... remember a million people in
the streets of London.

Not one major newspaper, TV channel, radio station or news magazine
presented the position that WMDs were not proven. CBC went along.
Coincidence?

MEANS: The common thread in the media that enable a conspiracy is
Jewish control and their infamous cohesion around issues near and dear.

MOTIVE: Saddam was sopporting Palestinian resistance to the theft of
their plots of land.

So. of course CBC bosses are engaged in ridiculing Trump's "conspiracy
theory".
M.I.Wakefield
2016-10-19 20:24:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kixi
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 20:28:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Kixi
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Unfortunately, the media lies. In fact, it's amazing that Trump is
always the main topic every night, even on CBC Newsworld, even when
World War 3 is about to begin as a result of tensions between the
Americans and the Russians. To say the least, if you believe anything
the media has to say about Trump, including his supposed sexual
assaults, then you have no ability to notice when people are lying to
you and you are little more than a sheep.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 20:41:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Kixi
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
He's a disgusting, opportunist and con-man.
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Unfortunately, the media lies. In fact, it's amazing that Trump is
always the main topic every night, even on CBC Newsworld, even when
World War 3 is about to begin as a result of tensions between the
Americans and the Russians. To say the least, if you believe anything
the media has to say about Trump, including his supposed sexual
assaults, then you have no ability to notice when people are lying to
you and you are little more than a sheep.
Does the media lie when it quotes Trump claiming that Clinton was both a
terrible and terrific secretary of state?
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 20:59:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Kixi
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
He's a disgusting, opportunist and con-man.
Like Justin Trudeau.
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Unfortunately, the media lies. In fact, it's amazing that Trump is
always the main topic every night, even on CBC Newsworld, even when
World War 3 is about to begin as a result of tensions between the
Americans and the Russians. To say the least, if you believe anything
the media has to say about Trump, including his supposed sexual
assaults, then you have no ability to notice when people are lying to
you and you are little more than a sheep.
Does the media lie when it quotes Trump claiming that Clinton was both a
terrible and terrific secretary of state?
There's no denying that HilLIARy has been exposed as an absolute turd of
a Secretary of State since that original quote was made. Perhaps the man
didn't know as much then as he knows now. However, anyone who says that
HilLIARy was anything but total garbage is an ignorant twat.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 21:02:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Kixi
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
He's a disgusting, opportunist and con-man.
Like Justin Trudeau.
Even if that's true...

...you just admitted you were talking bullshit a moment ago.
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Unfortunately, the media lies. In fact, it's amazing that Trump is
always the main topic every night, even on CBC Newsworld, even when
World War 3 is about to begin as a result of tensions between the
Americans and the Russians. To say the least, if you believe anything
the media has to say about Trump, including his supposed sexual
assaults, then you have no ability to notice when people are lying to
you and you are little more than a sheep.
Does the media lie when it quotes Trump claiming that Clinton was both a
terrible and terrific secretary of state?
There's no denying that HilLIARy has been exposed as an absolute turd of
a Secretary of State since that original quote was made. Perhaps the man
didn't know as much then as he knows now. However, anyone who says that
HilLIARy was anything but total garbage is an ignorant twat.
When was the original quote made? You must KNOW that to make that claim,
right?
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:13:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Kixi
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
He's a disgusting, opportunist and con-man.
Like Justin Trudeau.
Even if that's true...
...you just admitted you were talking bullshit a moment ago.
I'm aware of how you love to manipulate messages to say things which
were never communicated. You do it all the time in the Mac newsgroup and
I'm not surprised that you do it here. Only a liberal would play such
childish games.

Trump is only losing money by running for president and especially if he
wins. He gains nothing from the role and would have been better off
keeping quiet and running his multiple businesses. Unlike HilLIARy who
made hundreds of millions of dollars selling the United States to
foreign parties, Trump will not make money in his role as president
especially since he knows that the liberal, lying media that only 6% of
Americans actually trust will be nitpicking every single one of his
moves looking for _any_ reason to have him impeached.
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Unfortunately, the media lies. In fact, it's amazing that Trump is
always the main topic every night, even on CBC Newsworld, even when
World War 3 is about to begin as a result of tensions between the
Americans and the Russians. To say the least, if you believe anything
the media has to say about Trump, including his supposed sexual
assaults, then you have no ability to notice when people are lying to
you and you are little more than a sheep.
Does the media lie when it quotes Trump claiming that Clinton was both a
terrible and terrific secretary of state?
There's no denying that HilLIARy has been exposed as an absolute turd of
a Secretary of State since that original quote was made. Perhaps the man
didn't know as much then as he knows now. However, anyone who says that
HilLIARy was anything but total garbage is an ignorant twat.
When was the original quote made? You must KNOW that to make that claim,
right?
I've been following politics very closely and have noted everything that
has been said by everyone at every debate. The original comment was made
in 2012, the new ones (more than one) were made as of 2015.

However, I have nothing to prove to you. You keep behaving as though
you're some sort of authority on every matter and that we all need to
impress you. Meanwhile, you're a worthless turd and nobody gives a crap
about you. Either discuss a matter or fuck off; don't ask people to
prove anything to you as it is not up to you to validate information.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 21:20:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Kixi
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
He's a disgusting, opportunist and con-man.
Like Justin Trudeau.
Even if that's true...
...you just admitted you were talking bullshit a moment ago.
I'm aware of how you love to manipulate messages to say things which
were never communicated. You do it all the time in the Mac newsgroup and
I'm not surprised that you do it here. Only a liberal would play such
childish games.
Trump is only losing money by running for president and especially if he
wins. He gains nothing from the role and would have been better off
keeping quiet and running his multiple businesses. Unlike HilLIARy who
made hundreds of millions of dollars selling the United States to
foreign parties, Trump will not make money in his role as president
especially since he knows that the liberal, lying media that only 6% of
Americans actually trust will be nitpicking every single one of his
moves looking for _any_ reason to have him impeached.
You stated that Trump was "not a bad person", but then agreed he was a
"disgusting, opportunist and con-man".
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Unfortunately, the media lies. In fact, it's amazing that Trump is
always the main topic every night, even on CBC Newsworld, even when
World War 3 is about to begin as a result of tensions between the
Americans and the Russians. To say the least, if you believe anything
the media has to say about Trump, including his supposed sexual
assaults, then you have no ability to notice when people are lying to
you and you are little more than a sheep.
Does the media lie when it quotes Trump claiming that Clinton was both a
terrible and terrific secretary of state?
There's no denying that HilLIARy has been exposed as an absolute turd of
a Secretary of State since that original quote was made. Perhaps the man
didn't know as much then as he knows now. However, anyone who says that
HilLIARy was anything but total garbage is an ignorant twat.
When was the original quote made? You must KNOW that to make that claim,
right?
I've been following politics very closely and have noted everything that
has been said by everyone at every debate. The original comment was made
in 2012, the new ones (more than one) were made as of 2015.
One comment was made then...

...but this one:

“I know her very well. I know her husband very well. I like them both
and they’re just really terrific people. I like them both very much, but
I think you’ll be looking at the record of Hillary Clinton and how did
she do as secretary of state–probably above and beyond everybody else
and everything else. I don’t know if Benghazi resonated like it should
have. A lot of people are going to be looking at Hillary’s record as
secretary of state and she will be defending that record. I’m sure
she’ll do a good job defending it..”

...that's from August 11, 2013; more than six months AFTER she finished
her term.

<http://politistick.com/flashback-trump-praises-hillary-benghazi-video/#>
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
However, I have nothing to prove to you. You keep behaving as though
you're some sort of authority on every matter and that we all need to
impress you. Meanwhile, you're a worthless turd and nobody gives a crap
about you. Either discuss a matter or fuck off; don't ask people to
prove anything to you as it is not up to you to validate information.
It's certainly not up to me to validate what you claim...

...but it is fun to show you up for the know-little you actually are.

:-)
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:36:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Kixi
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
He's a disgusting, opportunist and con-man.
Like Justin Trudeau.
Even if that's true...
...you just admitted you were talking bullshit a moment ago.
I'm aware of how you love to manipulate messages to say things which
were never communicated. You do it all the time in the Mac newsgroup and
I'm not surprised that you do it here. Only a liberal would play such
childish games.
Trump is only losing money by running for president and especially if he
wins. He gains nothing from the role and would have been better off
keeping quiet and running his multiple businesses. Unlike HilLIARy who
made hundreds of millions of dollars selling the United States to
foreign parties, Trump will not make money in his role as president
especially since he knows that the liberal, lying media that only 6% of
Americans actually trust will be nitpicking every single one of his
moves looking for _any_ reason to have him impeached.
You stated that Trump was "not a bad person", but then agreed he was a
"disgusting, opportunist and con-man".
Find me the sentence where I say that I _agree_. My response is still up
there and it is "Like Justin Trudeau." There is no agreement there and
you have no right as a supposedly decent human being (I don't believe
that you are one) to suggest that I said anything that I didn't.
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Unfortunately, the media lies. In fact, it's amazing that Trump is
always the main topic every night, even on CBC Newsworld, even when
World War 3 is about to begin as a result of tensions between the
Americans and the Russians. To say the least, if you believe anything
the media has to say about Trump, including his supposed sexual
assaults, then you have no ability to notice when people are lying to
you and you are little more than a sheep.
Does the media lie when it quotes Trump claiming that Clinton was both a
terrible and terrific secretary of state?
There's no denying that HilLIARy has been exposed as an absolute turd of
a Secretary of State since that original quote was made. Perhaps the man
didn't know as much then as he knows now. However, anyone who says that
HilLIARy was anything but total garbage is an ignorant twat.
When was the original quote made? You must KNOW that to make that claim,
right?
I've been following politics very closely and have noted everything that
has been said by everyone at every debate. The original comment was made
in 2012, the new ones (more than one) were made as of 2015.
One comment was made then...
“I know her very well. I know her husband very well. I like them both
and they’re just really terrific people. I like them both very much, but
I think you’ll be looking at the record of Hillary Clinton and how did
she do as secretary of state–probably above and beyond everybody else
and everything else. I don’t know if Benghazi resonated like it should
have. A lot of people are going to be looking at Hillary’s record as
secretary of state and she will be defending that record. I’m sure
she’ll do a good job defending it..”
...that's from August 11, 2013; more than six months AFTER she finished
her term.
<http://politistick.com/flashback-trump-praises-hillary-benghazi-video/#>
Like I said originally, he might have learned something since then.
People change their minds and conservatives know this. Only liberals
think that people stay the same forever but that's usually because, like
you, they are disgusting morons.
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
However, I have nothing to prove to you. You keep behaving as though
you're some sort of authority on every matter and that we all need to
impress you. Meanwhile, you're a worthless turd and nobody gives a crap
about you. Either discuss a matter or fuck off; don't ask people to
prove anything to you as it is not up to you to validate information.
It's certainly not up to me to validate what you claim...
...but it is fun to show you up for the know-little you actually are.
:-)
Says the Mac user who can't figure out technology and needs Apple to
hold his hand.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 21:39:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Kixi
Of course CBC would ridicule Trump for saying the media is conspiring
to prevent his winning.
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
He's a disgusting, opportunist and con-man.
Like Justin Trudeau.
Even if that's true...
...you just admitted you were talking bullshit a moment ago.
I'm aware of how you love to manipulate messages to say things which
were never communicated. You do it all the time in the Mac newsgroup and
I'm not surprised that you do it here. Only a liberal would play such
childish games.
Trump is only losing money by running for president and especially if he
wins. He gains nothing from the role and would have been better off
keeping quiet and running his multiple businesses. Unlike HilLIARy who
made hundreds of millions of dollars selling the United States to
foreign parties, Trump will not make money in his role as president
especially since he knows that the liberal, lying media that only 6% of
Americans actually trust will be nitpicking every single one of his
moves looking for _any_ reason to have him impeached.
You stated that Trump was "not a bad person", but then agreed he was a
"disgusting, opportunist and con-man".
Find me the sentence where I say that I _agree_. My response is still up
there and it is "Like Justin Trudeau." There is no agreement there and
you have no right as a supposedly decent human being (I don't believe
that you are one) to suggest that I said anything that I didn't.
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Unfortunately, the media lies. In fact, it's amazing that Trump is
always the main topic every night, even on CBC Newsworld, even when
World War 3 is about to begin as a result of tensions between the
Americans and the Russians. To say the least, if you believe anything
the media has to say about Trump, including his supposed sexual
assaults, then you have no ability to notice when people are lying to
you and you are little more than a sheep.
Does the media lie when it quotes Trump claiming that Clinton was both a
terrible and terrific secretary of state?
There's no denying that HilLIARy has been exposed as an absolute turd of
a Secretary of State since that original quote was made. Perhaps the man
didn't know as much then as he knows now. However, anyone who says that
HilLIARy was anything but total garbage is an ignorant twat.
When was the original quote made? You must KNOW that to make that claim,
right?
I've been following politics very closely and have noted everything that
has been said by everyone at every debate. The original comment was made
in 2012, the new ones (more than one) were made as of 2015.
One comment was made then...
“I know her very well. I know her husband very well. I like them both
and they’re just really terrific people. I like them both very much, but
I think you’ll be looking at the record of Hillary Clinton and how did
she do as secretary of state–probably above and beyond everybody else
and everything else. I don’t know if Benghazi resonated like it should
have. A lot of people are going to be looking at Hillary’s record as
secretary of state and she will be defending that record. I’m sure
she’ll do a good job defending it..”
...that's from August 11, 2013; more than six months AFTER she finished
her term.
<http://politistick.com/flashback-trump-praises-hillary-benghazi-video/#>
Like I said originally, he might have learned something since then.
People change their minds and conservatives know this. Only liberals
think that people stay the same forever but that's usually because, like
you, they are disgusting morons.
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
However, I have nothing to prove to you. You keep behaving as though
you're some sort of authority on every matter and that we all need to
impress you. Meanwhile, you're a worthless turd and nobody gives a crap
about you. Either discuss a matter or fuck off; don't ask people to
prove anything to you as it is not up to you to validate information.
It's certainly not up to me to validate what you claim...
...but it is fun to show you up for the know-little you actually are.
:-)
Says the Mac user who can't figure out technology and needs Apple to
hold his hand.
LOL!

I win!
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:52:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
LOL!
I win!
Love to reconstruct reality in your favour, eh? You must have embraced
your schizophrenia.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 22:01:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
LOL!
I win!
Love to reconstruct reality in your favour, eh? You must have embraced
your schizophrenia.
LOL!
M.I.Wakefield
2016-10-19 21:32:22 UTC
Permalink
Trump is only losing money by running for president ...
This is true. He's revealed himself to be such a horrible human being that
he's killing his own brand:

The five-star Trump International Hotel in Washington DC occupies the US
capital’s grand, 19th-century Old Post Office building. But while the owner
has touted it as the “best hotel in Washington” and taken every opportunity
to promote its recent opening on the presidential campaign trail, the Trump
DC has reportedly struggled to attract custom.

Ahead of the annual October meetings of the World Bank and IMF, every other
five-star hotel in Downtown Washington was fully booked. But days before the
conference, according to New York, the Trump DC was reduced to flogging its
empty rooms at heavily discounted rates. Its entrance was recently defaced
with “Black Lives Matter” graffiti, while two celebrity chefs – dismayed by
Trump’s anti-Mexican rhetoric – pulled out of planned hotel restaurant
ventures.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-brand-toxic-trump-tv-hotel-washington-a7368811.html
... and especially if he wins.
No worries there, then.

https://www.gamblinginsider.com/news/2512/paddy-power-paying-out-early-on-us-presidential-election-bets
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:46:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump is only losing money by running for president ...
This is true. He's revealed himself to be such a horrible human being
The five-star Trump International Hotel in Washington DC occupies the US
capital’s grand, 19th-century Old Post Office building. But while the
owner has touted it as the “best hotel in Washington” and taken every
opportunity to promote its recent opening on the presidential campaign
trail, the Trump DC has reportedly struggled to attract custom.
Ahead of the annual October meetings of the World Bank and IMF, every
other five-star hotel in Downtown Washington was fully booked. But days
before the conference, according to New York, the Trump DC was reduced
to flogging its empty rooms at heavily discounted rates. Its entrance
was recently defaced with “Black Lives Matter” graffiti, while two
celebrity chefs – dismayed by Trump’s anti-Mexican rhetoric – pulled out
of planned hotel restaurant ventures.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-brand-toxic-trump-tv-hotel-washington-a7368811.html
A hit piece by a liberal rag? Unthinkable! I haven't seen any of those
during the past 18 months, especially not on TV! Geez, you can't get
dumber if you tried.

As for his "anti-Mexican" rhetoric, it doesn't exist. He said that he
wants to build a wall because the Mexicans coming in are not their best
and that the country is exporting its criminals and rapists. No matter
how much the media lies and tries to say that he's wrong, he's
constantly being proven right and these repeatedly-deported criminals
keep making their way back in and commit rape, murders and other crimes.
It's not "anti-Mexican" to believe that the security of the citizens of
the United States is a priority and that Mexicans - whether criminal or
innocent - should come in through legal means rather than forcing their
way in. Only liberal imbeciles like you are stupid enough to suggest
otherwise.
Post by M.I.Wakefield
... and especially if he wins.
No worries there, then.
https://www.gamblinginsider.com/news/2512/paddy-power-paying-out-early-on-us-presidential-election-bets
What the Hell does it matter what some Irish bookie thinks? Look at the
polls and you'll notice that even liberal media like CNN is showing that
Trump is either leading, tied or close behind and their polls are rigged
anyway as the samples taken included a larger proportion of known
Democrats.

Look at how many rallies Trump has filled to the brim and how Hillary
has struggled to even get a hundred people to hers. She doesn't even
campaign anymore because she knows that nobody actually cares about her.
The last time she did it, they had to bus people from one place to
another (similarly to how they bus people from one place to another to
engage in voting fraud) just to make the place look full.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
M.I.Wakefield
2016-10-19 22:04:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-brand-toxic-trump-tv-hotel-washington-a7368811.html
A hit piece by a liberal rag?
That phrase might carry more weight if, for you, it didn't include all media
except Breitbart and Infowars.
M.I.Wakefield
2016-10-19 20:55:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back and
explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 21:01:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
Juvenile...
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:02:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.

The Clintons deserve nothing better than a guillotine for their crimes
against humanity. If they are too rusty to get the job done, spending
the rest of their lives in solitary confinement would be a suitable
punishment.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Nobody
2016-10-19 21:05:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good
friend, a true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the
next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then
come back and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to
be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of
the soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would
have loved for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape
victims to the debate as they are women that HilLIARy herself
attacked mercilessly to defend her disgusting pig of a husband.
How about Obama's brother? Miss that one?
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
The Clintons deserve nothing better than a guillotine for their
crimes against humanity. If they are too rusty to get the job
done, spending the rest of their lives in solitary confinement
would be a suitable punishment.
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:30:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nobody
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good
friend, a true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the
next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then
come back and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to
be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of
the soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would
have loved for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape
victims to the debate as they are women that HilLIARy herself
attacked mercilessly to defend her disgusting pig of a husband.
How about Obama's brother? Miss that one?
I did. Finding this out puts a smile on my face.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 21:31:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Nobody
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good
friend, a true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the
next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then
come back and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to
be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of
the soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would
have loved for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape
victims to the debate as they are women that HilLIARy herself
attacked mercilessly to defend her disgusting pig of a husband.
How about Obama's brother? Miss that one?
I did. Finding this out puts a smile on my face.
Why?

Of what possible relevance is Obama's family?
M.I.Wakefield
2016-10-19 21:34:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Of what possible relevance is Obama's family?
There's a maxim about armies training to fight the last war, not the next
one ... Trump hasn't figured out that he's running against Hillary, not
Bill, or Barack.
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:37:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Nobody
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good
friend, a true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the
next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then
come back and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to
be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of
the soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would
have loved for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape
victims to the debate as they are women that HilLIARy herself
attacked mercilessly to defend her disgusting pig of a husband.
How about Obama's brother? Miss that one?
I did. Finding this out puts a smile on my face.
Why?
Of what possible relevance is Obama's family?
We don't know yet, do we? We'll find out at the debate.

However, if I recall correctly, Obama's half-brother endorsed Trump.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 21:40:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Nobody
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good
friend, a true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the
next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then
come back and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to
be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of
the soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would
have loved for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape
victims to the debate as they are women that HilLIARy herself
attacked mercilessly to defend her disgusting pig of a husband.
How about Obama's brother? Miss that one?
I did. Finding this out puts a smile on my face.
Why?
Of what possible relevance is Obama's family?
We don't know yet, do we? We'll find out at the debate.
However, if I recall correctly, Obama's half-brother endorsed Trump.
How much was he paid?

You know you'd be asking that question if the situation were reversed.

BTW, do you have a reason so many Republicans are on record endorsing
Clinton?
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:54:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Nobody
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good
friend, a true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the
next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then
come back and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to
be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of
the soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would
have loved for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape
victims to the debate as they are women that HilLIARy herself
attacked mercilessly to defend her disgusting pig of a husband.
How about Obama's brother? Miss that one?
I did. Finding this out puts a smile on my face.
Why?
Of what possible relevance is Obama's family?
We don't know yet, do we? We'll find out at the debate.
However, if I recall correctly, Obama's half-brother endorsed Trump.
How much was he paid?
You know you'd be asking that question if the situation were reversed.
BTW, do you have a reason so many Republicans are on record endorsing
Clinton?
The Bushes are the first and that's because their family is as criminal
as the Clintons are.

The others were part of the #NeverTrump movement which didn't want him
to be the Republican candidate in the first place. They never really
endorsed him and evidence suggests that they were the ones who released
his Billy Bush tape a few weeks ago. Even after they "endorsed" him,
they were looking for a reason to backtrack and demonize him.

Again, you sad sack of ignorant excrement, you are schooled.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 22:02:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Nobody
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good
friend, a true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the
next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then
come back and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to
be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of
the soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would
have loved for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape
victims to the debate as they are women that HilLIARy herself
attacked mercilessly to defend her disgusting pig of a husband.
How about Obama's brother? Miss that one?
I did. Finding this out puts a smile on my face.
Why?
Of what possible relevance is Obama's family?
We don't know yet, do we? We'll find out at the debate.
However, if I recall correctly, Obama's half-brother endorsed Trump.
How much was he paid?
You know you'd be asking that question if the situation were reversed.
BTW, do you have a reason so many Republicans are on record endorsing
Clinton?
The Bushes are the first and that's because their family is as criminal
as the Clintons are.
Cite; for both that they were the first, and that they are "as criminal"
and that the Clintons are criminal.

:-)
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
The others were part of the #NeverTrump movement which didn't want him
to be the Republican candidate in the first place. They never really
endorsed him and evidence suggests that they were the ones who released
his Billy Bush tape a few weeks ago. Even after they "endorsed" him,
they were looking for a reason to backtrack and demonize him.
Again, you sad sack of ignorant excrement, you are schooled.
You actually BELIEVE your religion!
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 22:40:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Nobody
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good
friend, a true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the
next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then
come back and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to
be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of
the soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would
have loved for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape
victims to the debate as they are women that HilLIARy herself
attacked mercilessly to defend her disgusting pig of a husband.
How about Obama's brother? Miss that one?
I did. Finding this out puts a smile on my face.
Why?
Of what possible relevance is Obama's family?
We don't know yet, do we? We'll find out at the debate.
However, if I recall correctly, Obama's half-brother endorsed Trump.
How much was he paid?
You know you'd be asking that question if the situation were reversed.
BTW, do you have a reason so many Republicans are on record endorsing
Clinton?
The Bushes are the first and that's because their family is as criminal
as the Clintons are.
Cite; for both that they were the first, and that they are "as criminal"
and that the Clintons are criminal.
:-)
You've embraced your imbecility, haven't you?
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 22:44:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Nobody
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good
friend, a true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the
next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then
come back and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to
be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of
the soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would
have loved for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape
victims to the debate as they are women that HilLIARy herself
attacked mercilessly to defend her disgusting pig of a husband.
How about Obama's brother? Miss that one?
I did. Finding this out puts a smile on my face.
Why?
Of what possible relevance is Obama's family?
We don't know yet, do we? We'll find out at the debate.
However, if I recall correctly, Obama's half-brother endorsed Trump.
How much was he paid?
You know you'd be asking that question if the situation were reversed.
BTW, do you have a reason so many Republicans are on record endorsing
Clinton?
The Bushes are the first and that's because their family is as criminal
as the Clintons are.
Cite; for both that they were the first, and that they are "as criminal"
and that the Clintons are criminal.
:-)
You've embraced your imbecility, haven't you?
I take it you have...

...nothing.
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 21:06:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.
You DO realize that Clinton wasn't in charge of the military, right?

And that Bill Clinton isn't running for president?
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
The Clintons deserve nothing better than a guillotine for their crimes
against humanity. If they are too rusty to get the job done, spending
the rest of their lives in solitary confinement would be a suitable
punishment.
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:33:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.
You DO realize that Clinton wasn't in charge of the military, right?
She did, however, have the authority to act and send help to the
soldiers in question but didn't. Apparently, you missed that part in
defending your overlord.
Post by Alan Baker
And that Bill Clinton isn't running for president?
Except that HilLIARy Clinton defended her husbands actions by attacking
his victims. She is also guilty of letting a pedophile who raped a 13
year-old go free by tampering with the evidence and attacking the
victim. She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. THAT is a monster and you are an even bigger idiot for supporting
her. Apparently, your brilliant ass missed that.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 21:38:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.
You DO realize that Clinton wasn't in charge of the military, right?
She did, however, have the authority to act and send help to the
soldiers in question but didn't. Apparently, you missed that part in
defending your overlord.
Cite, please...
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
And that Bill Clinton isn't running for president?
Except that HilLIARy Clinton defended her husbands actions by attacking
his victims. She is also guilty of letting a pedophile who raped a 13
year-old go free by tampering with the evidence and attacking the
victim. She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. THAT is a monster and you are an even bigger idiot for supporting
her. Apparently, your brilliant ass missed that.
Cites, please.
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 21:51:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.
You DO realize that Clinton wasn't in charge of the military, right?
She did, however, have the authority to act and send help to the
soldiers in question but didn't. Apparently, you missed that part in
defending your overlord.
Cite, please...
Are you serious? Have you been living under a rock during this entire
campaign?
<http://ijr.com/2015/03/278852-hillary-asks-loaded-question-benghazi-email-4-american-servicemen-never-chance-ask/>

" It denies that the former Secretary had issued any kind of “stand
down” order, although it is a fact that she failed to convene the
Counterterrorism Security Group, as was protocol in such emergency
situations."
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
And that Bill Clinton isn't running for president?
Except that HilLIARy Clinton defended her husbands actions by attacking
his victims. She is also guilty of letting a pedophile who raped a 13
year-old go free by tampering with the evidence and attacking the
victim. She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. THAT is a monster and you are an even bigger idiot for supporting
her. Apparently, your brilliant ass missed that.
Cites, please.
Fucking ignorant twat. Even THIS you are unaware of:



You're a pathetic, uninformed joke. It's no wonder you side with the
liberals.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 22:00:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.
You DO realize that Clinton wasn't in charge of the military, right?
She did, however, have the authority to act and send help to the
soldiers in question but didn't. Apparently, you missed that part in
defending your overlord.
Cite, please...
Are you serious? Have you been living under a rock during this entire
campaign?
<http://ijr.com/2015/03/278852-hillary-asks-loaded-question-benghazi-email-4-american-servicemen-never-chance-ask/>
" It denies that the former Secretary had issued any kind of “stand
down” order, although it is a fact that she failed to convene the
Counterterrorism Security Group, as was protocol in such emergency
situations."
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
And that Bill Clinton isn't running for president?
Except that HilLIARy Clinton defended her husbands actions by attacking
his victims. She is also guilty of letting a pedophile who raped a 13
year-old go free by tampering with the evidence and attacking the
victim. She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. THAT is a monster and you are an even bigger idiot for supporting
her. Apparently, your brilliant ass missed that.
Cites, please.
http://youtu.be/Tor00iWUhDQ
You're a pathetic, uninformed joke. It's no wonder you side with the
liberals.
Sorry, but there is zero support for your contention that she tampered
with evidence, and as an attorney, she was obligated to obtain the best
outcome for her client she could.

But thanks for showing you have nothing real.
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 22:35:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.
You DO realize that Clinton wasn't in charge of the military, right?
She did, however, have the authority to act and send help to the
soldiers in question but didn't. Apparently, you missed that part in
defending your overlord.
Cite, please...
Are you serious? Have you been living under a rock during this entire
campaign?
<http://ijr.com/2015/03/278852-hillary-asks-loaded-question-benghazi-email-4-american-servicemen-never-chance-ask/>
" It denies that the former Secretary had issued any kind of “stand
down” order, although it is a fact that she failed to convene the
Counterterrorism Security Group, as was protocol in such emergency
situations."
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
And that Bill Clinton isn't running for president?
Except that HilLIARy Clinton defended her husbands actions by attacking
his victims. She is also guilty of letting a pedophile who raped a 13
year-old go free by tampering with the evidence and attacking the
victim. She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. THAT is a monster and you are an even bigger idiot for supporting
her. Apparently, your brilliant ass missed that.
Cites, please.
http://youtu.be/Tor00iWUhDQ
You're a pathetic, uninformed joke. It's no wonder you side with the
liberals.
Sorry, but there is zero support for your contention that she tampered
with evidence, and as an attorney, she was obligated to obtain the best
outcome for her client she could.
But thanks for showing you have nothing real.
And thanks for demonstrating, yet again, that you are a true Apple moron
who is unable to make even the simplest search on the Internet to find
an article which talks about what I mentioned. Here's a liberal source
for you since I know your idiotic liberals tactics and know that you
would just question my source if I provided you with any other.

<http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/06/hillary-clinton-dogged-by-1975-rape-case/>

" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."

What Clinton did is that she essentially had the fabric sample with the
rapist's sperm on it destroyed and replaced with another fabric sample
which had no sperm on it. Of course, _you_ don't know about this because
you're a liberal moron who needs to see his overlord HilLIARy Clinton
come to power.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 22:39:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.
You DO realize that Clinton wasn't in charge of the military, right?
She did, however, have the authority to act and send help to the
soldiers in question but didn't. Apparently, you missed that part in
defending your overlord.
Cite, please...
Are you serious? Have you been living under a rock during this entire
campaign?
<http://ijr.com/2015/03/278852-hillary-asks-loaded-question-benghazi-email-4-american-servicemen-never-chance-ask/>
" It denies that the former Secretary had issued any kind of “stand
down” order, although it is a fact that she failed to convene the
Counterterrorism Security Group, as was protocol in such emergency
situations."
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
And that Bill Clinton isn't running for president?
Except that HilLIARy Clinton defended her husbands actions by attacking
his victims. She is also guilty of letting a pedophile who raped a 13
year-old go free by tampering with the evidence and attacking the
victim. She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. THAT is a monster and you are an even bigger idiot for supporting
her. Apparently, your brilliant ass missed that.
Cites, please.
http://youtu.be/Tor00iWUhDQ
You're a pathetic, uninformed joke. It's no wonder you side with the
liberals.
Sorry, but there is zero support for your contention that she tampered
with evidence, and as an attorney, she was obligated to obtain the best
outcome for her client she could.
But thanks for showing you have nothing real.
And thanks for demonstrating, yet again, that you are a true Apple moron
who is unable to make even the simplest search on the Internet to find
an article which talks about what I mentioned. Here's a liberal source
for you since I know your idiotic liberals tactics and know that you
would just question my source if I provided you with any other.
<http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/06/hillary-clinton-dogged-by-1975-rape-case/>
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
What Clinton did is that she essentially had the fabric sample with the
rapist's sperm on it destroyed and replaced with another fabric sample
which had no sperm on it. Of course, _you_ don't know about this because
you're a liberal moron who needs to see his overlord HilLIARy Clinton
come to power.
What proof do you offer of that assertion?

Your first cited source doesn't mention sperm at all, and explains that
it was the lab that sent back the underwear they'd tested, but with the
section that had the BLOOD on it cut out, and they discarded that part.
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-19 22:56:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.
You DO realize that Clinton wasn't in charge of the military, right?
She did, however, have the authority to act and send help to the
soldiers in question but didn't. Apparently, you missed that part in
defending your overlord.
Cite, please...
Are you serious? Have you been living under a rock during this entire
campaign?
<http://ijr.com/2015/03/278852-hillary-asks-loaded-question-benghazi-email-4-american-servicemen-never-chance-ask/>
" It denies that the former Secretary had issued any kind of “stand
down” order, although it is a fact that she failed to convene the
Counterterrorism Security Group, as was protocol in such emergency
situations."
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
And that Bill Clinton isn't running for president?
Except that HilLIARy Clinton defended her husbands actions by attacking
his victims. She is also guilty of letting a pedophile who raped a 13
year-old go free by tampering with the evidence and attacking the
victim. She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. THAT is a monster and you are an even bigger idiot for supporting
her. Apparently, your brilliant ass missed that.
Cites, please.
http://youtu.be/Tor00iWUhDQ
You're a pathetic, uninformed joke. It's no wonder you side with the
liberals.
Sorry, but there is zero support for your contention that she tampered
with evidence, and as an attorney, she was obligated to obtain the best
outcome for her client she could.
But thanks for showing you have nothing real.
And thanks for demonstrating, yet again, that you are a true Apple moron
who is unable to make even the simplest search on the Internet to find
an article which talks about what I mentioned. Here's a liberal source
for you since I know your idiotic liberals tactics and know that you
would just question my source if I provided you with any other.
<http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/06/hillary-clinton-dogged-by-1975-rape-case/>
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
What Clinton did is that she essentially had the fabric sample with the
rapist's sperm on it destroyed and replaced with another fabric sample
which had no sperm on it. Of course, _you_ don't know about this because
you're a liberal moron who needs to see his overlord HilLIARy Clinton
come to power.
What proof do you offer of that assertion?
Your first cited source doesn't mention sperm at all, and explains that
it was the lab that sent back the underwear they'd tested, but with the
section that had the BLOOD on it cut out, and they discarded that part.
Semen & blood.

<https://www.intellihub.com/video-hillary-clinton-brags-getting-pedophile-off-hook/>

If you think that HilLIARy had nothing to do with the evidence
disappearing, especially since she had to go all the way to New York
City to "invalidate" the evidence, you're a dumber person than you've
already demonstrated yourself to be.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-19 23:06:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Trump's problem is reality, not the media.
The reality is that Trump is not a bad person. He's a good friend, a
true Patriot and probably the smartest pick for the next president.
Review who Trump's invitees are to tonight's debate, and then come back
and explain how that makes him a serious candidate to be POTUS.
As far as I know, the only person invited was the mother of one of the
soldiers HilLIARy left to die at Benghazi. However, I would have loved
for the man to bring more of Bill Clinton's rape victims to the debate
as they are women that HilLIARy herself attacked mercilessly to defend
her disgusting pig of a husband.
You DO realize that Clinton wasn't in charge of the military, right?
She did, however, have the authority to act and send help to the
soldiers in question but didn't. Apparently, you missed that part in
defending your overlord.
Cite, please...
Are you serious? Have you been living under a rock during this entire
campaign?
<http://ijr.com/2015/03/278852-hillary-asks-loaded-question-benghazi-email-4-american-servicemen-never-chance-ask/>
" It denies that the former Secretary had issued any kind of “stand
down” order, although it is a fact that she failed to convene the
Counterterrorism Security Group, as was protocol in such emergency
situations."
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
And that Bill Clinton isn't running for president?
Except that HilLIARy Clinton defended her husbands actions by attacking
his victims. She is also guilty of letting a pedophile who raped a 13
year-old go free by tampering with the evidence and attacking the
victim. She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. THAT is a monster and you are an even bigger idiot for supporting
her. Apparently, your brilliant ass missed that.
Cites, please.
http://youtu.be/Tor00iWUhDQ
You're a pathetic, uninformed joke. It's no wonder you side with the
liberals.
Sorry, but there is zero support for your contention that she tampered
with evidence, and as an attorney, she was obligated to obtain the best
outcome for her client she could.
But thanks for showing you have nothing real.
And thanks for demonstrating, yet again, that you are a true Apple moron
who is unable to make even the simplest search on the Internet to find
an article which talks about what I mentioned. Here's a liberal source
for you since I know your idiotic liberals tactics and know that you
would just question my source if I provided you with any other.
<http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/06/hillary-clinton-dogged-by-1975-rape-case/>
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
You did provide the earlier YouTube link as your support for this:

'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '

Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
What Clinton did is that she essentially had the fabric sample with the
rapist's sperm on it destroyed and replaced with another fabric sample
which had no sperm on it. Of course, _you_ don't know about this because
you're a liberal moron who needs to see his overlord HilLIARy Clinton
come to power.
What proof do you offer of that assertion?
Your first cited source doesn't mention sperm at all, and explains that
it was the lab that sent back the underwear they'd tested, but with the
section that had the BLOOD on it cut out, and they discarded that part.
Semen & blood.
Not your first source. It only mentioned blood.
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
<https://www.intellihub.com/video-hillary-clinton-brags-getting-pedophile-off-hook/>
If you think that HilLIARy had nothing to do with the evidence
disappearing, especially since she had to go all the way to New York
City to "invalidate" the evidence, you're a dumber person than you've
already demonstrated yourself to be.
What we both know is that you have nothing.
Deplorable Silver Slimer
2016-10-20 00:11:13 UTC
Permalink
On 2016-10-19 7:06 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that she did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
What Clinton did is that she essentially had the fabric sample with the
rapist's sperm on it destroyed and replaced with another fabric sample
which had no sperm on it. Of course, _you_ don't know about this because
you're a liberal moron who needs to see his overlord HilLIARy Clinton
come to power.
What proof do you offer of that assertion?
Your first cited source doesn't mention sperm at all, and explains that
it was the lab that sent back the underwear they'd tested, but with the
section that had the BLOOD on it cut out, and they discarded that part.
Semen & blood.
Not your first source. It only mentioned blood.
Ignore the source and focus on what I'm saying.
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
<https://www.intellihub.com/video-hillary-clinton-brags-getting-pedophile-off-hook/>
If you think that HilLIARy had nothing to do with the evidence
disappearing, especially since she had to go all the way to New York
City to "invalidate" the evidence, you're a dumber person than you've
already demonstrated yourself to be.
What we both know is that you have nothing.
I have already demonstrated, with sources no less, that _you_ know
nothing other than what the subjective media which protects HilLIARy at
all costs tells you. Not only were you not aware of her past as a
lawyer, you knew nothing about how discredited Trump's accusers were and
were also too stupid to find it even slightly suspicious that all of his
accusers decided to come forward now, at a very opportune time. You're
clearly under some delusion that you're smart and some sort of authority
on knowledge but I've already demonstrated how ignorant you are. With
that in mind, I win and once again you have shown how pathetic liberals
are with their lack of knowledge.
--
Deplorable Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-20 00:20:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that she did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
What Clinton did is that she essentially had the fabric sample with the
rapist's sperm on it destroyed and replaced with another fabric sample
which had no sperm on it. Of course, _you_ don't know about this because
you're a liberal moron who needs to see his overlord HilLIARy Clinton
come to power.
What proof do you offer of that assertion?
Your first cited source doesn't mention sperm at all, and explains that
it was the lab that sent back the underwear they'd tested, but with the
section that had the BLOOD on it cut out, and they discarded that part.
Semen & blood.
Not your first source. It only mentioned blood.
Ignore the source and focus on what I'm saying.
You mean the empty, unsupported things you're saying?
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
<https://www.intellihub.com/video-hillary-clinton-brags-getting-pedophile-off-hook/>
If you think that HilLIARy had nothing to do with the evidence
disappearing, especially since she had to go all the way to New York
City to "invalidate" the evidence, you're a dumber person than you've
already demonstrated yourself to be.
What we both know is that you have nothing.
I have already demonstrated, with sources no less, that _you_ know
You just told me to ignore the sources.
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
nothing other than what the subjective media which protects HilLIARy at
all costs tells you. Not only were you not aware of her past as a
lawyer, you knew nothing about how discredited Trump's accusers were and
were also too stupid to find it even slightly suspicious that all of his
accusers decided to come forward now, at a very opportune time. You're
clearly under some delusion that you're smart and some sort of authority
on knowledge but I've already demonstrated how ignorant you are. With
that in mind, I win and once again you have shown how pathetic liberals
are with their lack of knowledge.
You've now claimed that Clinton tampered with evidence...

...and none of your sources support that.
Silver Slimer
2016-10-20 00:39:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that she did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.

< snip >
--
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-20 00:42:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that she did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.

:-)
Silver Slimer
2016-10-20 01:00:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that she did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
--
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-20 01:05:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics she used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that she did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...

...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Silver Slimer
2016-10-20 13:46:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that she did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
--
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-20 20:55:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I know that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which feed your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that she did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
It's your job to support your claims...

...only you can't, can you?

:-)
Silver Slimer
2016-10-20 21:14:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence
against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I
know
that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which
feed
your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that
she
did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
It's your job to support your claims...
...only you can't, can you?
I don't respect you, so I don't feel any particular need to make you happy.
--
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-20 21:25:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how
she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence
against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I
know
that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which
feed
your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for life as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that
she
did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
It's your job to support your claims...
...only you can't, can you?
I don't respect you, so I don't feel any particular need to make you happy.
It wouldn't make me happy, though.

You failing makes me happy.

:-)
Silver Slimer
2016-10-20 21:29:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how
she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence
against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I
know
that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which
feed
your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own
naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for
life
as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that
she
did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
It's your job to support your claims...
...only you can't, can you?
I don't respect you, so I don't feel any particular need to make you happy.
It wouldn't make me happy, though.
You failing makes me happy.
People who fail at life use Apple products and you're a Mac advocate.
--
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-20 21:33:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton describes how
she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the evidence
against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you
provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I
know
that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which
feed
your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own
naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for
life
as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that
she
did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
It's your job to support your claims...
...only you can't, can you?
I don't respect you, so I don't feel any particular need to make you happy.
It wouldn't make me happy, though.
You failing makes me happy.
People who fail at life use Apple products and you're a Mac advocate.
LOL!

I win!
Silver Slimer
2016-10-20 22:18:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton
describes how
she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the
evidence
against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the
tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you
provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I
know
that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which
feed
your
washed brains.
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own
naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for
life
as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that
she
did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals
have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
It's your job to support your claims...
...only you can't, can you?
I don't respect you, so I don't feel any particular need to make you happy.
It wouldn't make me happy, though.
You failing makes me happy.
People who fail at life use Apple products and you're a Mac advocate.
LOL!
I win!
Whatever rocks your miserable little boat, Baked Anus.
--
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-20 22:28:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton
describes how
she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the
evidence
against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the
tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you
provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I
know
that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources which
feed
your
washed brains.
You did provide the earlier YouTube link as your support for
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had done
it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own
naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12 year-old girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for
life
as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that
she
did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals
have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the fact that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
It's your job to support your claims...
...only you can't, can you?
I don't respect you, so I don't feel any particular need to make you happy.
It wouldn't make me happy, though.
You failing makes me happy.
People who fail at life use Apple products and you're a Mac advocate.
LOL!
I win!
Whatever rocks your miserable little boat, Baked Anus.
Any time you have to slip into ad hominem attacks, you lose.
Silver Slimer
2016-10-20 22:43:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton
describes how
she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the
evidence
against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the
tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you
provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it because I
know
that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources
which
feed
your
washed brains.
You did provide the earlier YouTube link as your support for
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact that
he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had
done
it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her own
naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12
year-old
girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for
life
as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way that
she
did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals
have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the
fact
that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
It's your job to support your claims...
...only you can't, can you?
I don't respect you, so I don't feel any particular need to make you happy.
It wouldn't make me happy, though.
You failing makes me happy.
People who fail at life use Apple products and you're a Mac advocate.
LOL!
I win!
Whatever rocks your miserable little boat, Baked Anus.
Any time you have to slip into ad hominem attacks, you lose.
I don't really care how you perceive things, Baked Anus. If you feel
like being delusional and claiming victory, go right ahead; none of your
posts suggest that you are right in the head.
--
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
Gab.ai: @silverslimer
Alan Baker
2016-10-20 22:45:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
< snip >
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Deplorable Silver Slimer
" In the tapes, from over 30 years ago, Clinton
describes how
she was
able to find a loophole in the system to discredit the
evidence
against
her client. She is heard laughing as she describes the
tactics
she
used
to do so."
Except that wasn't when she laughed in the recording you
provided.
I didn't write that article, idiot. I only chose it
because I
know
that
braindead liberals like you only believe liberal sources
which
feed
your
washed brains.
You did provide the earlier YouTube link as your support for
'She knew her client was guilty and laughed about the fact
that
he had
passed a lie detector test because it was clear that he had
done
it. '
Except all it was was a brief self-deprecating laugh at her
own
naivety.
Brilliant. The fact remains that a man who raped a 12
year-old
girl
ended up serving little to no time after traumatizing her for
life
as a
result of HilLIARy deciding to tamper with evidence the way
that
she
did
but it's all OK because she was self-deprecating. You liberals
have no
morals whatsoever.
You still have no proof at all that Clinton tampered with
anything.
I guess you'll have to read the long articles which speak on the
subject. Be my guest and look them up.
< snip >
Having nothing... ..you run like the little coward you are.
:-)
No, I just think that the fact that you spend your entire day on
Usenet,
in at least two newsgroups no less, is very unhealthy and am
encouraging
you to do something else. This was reported very well and the
fact
that
you haven't seen any of it shows that you rely only on very subjective
sources.
If it was reported so very well...
...why have you spent more effort avoiding providing the support you've
just claimed would be so easy to provide than you would have simply
providing it?
Because it is not my job to educate you. I bring up the facts and it's
your job to look them up if you don't believe me. You have no moral,
intellectual or other authority here.
It's your job to support your claims...
...only you can't, can you?
I don't respect you, so I don't feel any particular need to make you happy.
It wouldn't make me happy, though.
You failing makes me happy.
People who fail at life use Apple products and you're a Mac advocate.
LOL!
I win!
Whatever rocks your miserable little boat, Baked Anus.
Any time you have to slip into ad hominem attacks, you lose.
I don't really care how you perceive things, Baked Anus. If you feel
like being delusional and claiming victory, go right ahead; none of your
posts suggest that you are right in the head.
LOL!

Loading...